The Supreme Court is about to decide whether to interfere in the election again
Ian Millhiser is a senior correspondent at Vox, where he focuses on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the decline of liberal democracy in the United States. He received a JD from Duke University and is the author of two books on the Supreme Court.
When politics interferes with criminal prosecutions, it is always dangerous to human freedom and due process. Yet present-day ...
That is why court packing is such an anathema to our democracy. Court packing would introduce a toxic cycle into Supreme ...
The Ohio Supreme Court will inevitably rule on abortion access decisions following the passage of last year’s reproductive rights amendment — meaning whichever justices are elected this year will help ...
I interpret the law consistently in every case. I uphold my oath as a jurist just as I do as a soldier in the U.S. Army. I ...
I’ve realized that it can be hard to predict the out-of-nowhere question a justice might ask, U.S. Solicitor General ...
Sandra Day O'Connor was the last justice who held elective office, as a state senator in Arizona. In today's court, every justice — other than Elena Kagan — has been a federal appellate judge. Kagan ...
The North Carolina law, along with legislation adopted by other states, recognizes research that shows coming to terms with ...
The Supreme Court’s latest opinion on gun rights has done little so far to eliminate the disagreement and confusion among ...
Regardless of method, changing the Court as a reflexive response to politically undesirable decisions would not only be bad ...
Right-leaning lower courts ruled partially in favor of the plaintiffs ... Care Act in a legal challenge brought by ...
From troubling election denialism to rampant misinformation about voter fraud, there are already multiple respects in which ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback